{"id":38480,"date":"2020-06-30T11:46:07","date_gmt":"2020-06-30T09:46:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/libmod.de\/?p=38480"},"modified":"2020-07-03T14:23:12","modified_gmt":"2020-07-03T12:23:12","slug":"shraibman-whom-the-west-should-support-in-belarus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/libmod.de\/en\/shraibman-whom-the-west-should-support-in-belarus\/","title":{"rendered":"Whom the West should support in Belarus? A time for a strategic approach"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Anonymous photo action in Belarus: Allegedly, only 3% are supporting Lukashenka. Foto: t.me\/belamova<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=\u201d.vc_custom_1508251598805{margin-top: 30px !important;}\u201d][vc_column width=\u201c2\/3\u201d css=\u201d.vc_custom_1508252250311{padding-right: 20px !important;}\u201d][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Tradi\u00adtional opposition parties and movements has long seized to be a polit\u00adi\u00adcally meaningful force in Belarus. It is time for Western decision-makers to finally admit this unpleasant reality and shift its rather scarce attention and resources to more promising segments of Belarusian civil society.<\/h3>\n

<\/p>\n

After Alexander Lukashenko took and consol\u00adi\u00addated his autocratic power in Belarus in 1996, the oppor\u00adtu\u00adnities for the opposi\u00adtional activity have shrunk. Opposition was removed from the parliament, local self-gover\u00adnance, electoral commis\u00adsions and nationwide media. The unautho\u00adrized protest activity was made illegal and personally dangerous for the leaders and groups, who dared to go to the streets.<\/p>\n

Business was explicitly warned against supporting the opposition. The politi\u00adcians had to turn to foreign, usually \u2013 Western funding, which in some cases added other aspects to their motivation. Foreign fundraising has become instru\u00admental to the opposi\u00adtion\u2019s preser\u00advation, while the connection with the electorate has become thinner.<\/p>\n

Deprived of political oppor\u00adtu\u00adnities in the country, the opposition, metaphor\u00adi\u00adcally speaking, began to rot from inside. Coupled with regular crack downs, this absence of success stories has made even the pro-democ\u00adratic people in Belarus learn a simple lesson \u2013 lose affil\u00adi\u00adation with the opposition will, at best, do nothing for the country\u2019s future, or \u2013 at worst \u2013 bring about troubles for a person\u2019s own living.<\/p>\n

While the race for presi\u00addential elections in 2010 with a dozen opposition candi\u00addates was a relatively open campaign, the crackdown on the protests against fraud on the election\u2019s eve with arrests and prison sentences for nearly all opposition candi\u00addates led to a decap\u00adi\u00adtation of the opposition parties. Opposition leaders that were not imprisoned fled the country or withdrew from political exposure. The aftermath of 2010 is a systematic destruction of the tradi\u00adtional opposition that never recovered from this strike.<\/p>\n

The lack of success of the opposition has led to a phenomenon often described as negative selection. Most of the ambitious young profes\u00adsionals, who in other countries might have become political activists, in Belarus prefer other ways of self-actual\u00adization. It may be business, art, civil society, science, education abroad, but not politics. As a result, compe\u00adtence and human resources have been leaving the opposition as well. The parties had to rely on the activists and leaders, most of whom got into politics in the 1990\u2011s.<\/p>\n

Finally, even the opposition leaders have accepted a bitter reality that they have virtually no chances to win in the foreseeable future. This has removed the motivation to unite forces with others. Fractures and fragmen\u00adtation have become a mode of existence for many opposition groups.<\/p>\n

Since 1996, when Lukashenko removed checks on his power, the opposition made nearly 20 attempts to create various coali\u00adtions and blocks. Even the most promising of them \u2013 the Coordi\u00adnation Council of Democ\u00adratic Forces (estab\u00adlished in 1999), United Democ\u00adratic Forces (2004), Belarusian Independent Block (2009), and People\u2019s Refer\u00adendum (2013) \u2013 all ended with emotional divorces.<\/p>\n

To reiterate, not only the opposition itself is to blame. It is objec\u00adtively hard to sustain a vibrant political activity, when opposed by the consol\u00adi\u00addated and often brutal author\u00adi\u00adtarian regime. However, this injustice does not alter the fact that the tradi\u00adtional opposition is hardly capable of becoming a source of change in Belarus.<\/p>\n

The presi\u00addential campaign of 2020 has become the best confir\u00admation of that. The cocktail of economic crisis and Lukashenko\u2019s dismis\u00adsiveness of the COVID-19 pandemic has triggered an unprece\u00addented rise in political activity in the country. But the leaders, who channeled this popular disaf\u00adfection, were all the political neophytes \u2013 the former banker Viktor Babariko, former senior official Valery Tsepkalo and a youtube-blogger Sergei Tikhanovsky.<\/p>\n

Where was the opposition? Part of them decided to boycott the election. Several groups within the Centre-right coalition were arguing about the procedure to nominate a single candidate, and then failed to do so in time. Some groups and leaders joined Tikhanovsky\u2019s movement and fell under the crackdown together with him. Only two recog\u00adnizable opposition leaders \u2013 a former MP Anna Kanopatskaya and the head of a moderate campaign Tell the Truth Andrei Dmitriev \u2013 applied for regis\u00adtration as candi\u00addates for presi\u00addency but were overshadowed by the new alter\u00adnative leaders.<\/p>\n

The Western policy makers, including the political founda\u00adtions and national govern\u00adments, have never had too much funding or political attention reserved for Belarus. That is precisely why it is important to focus all the available resources and energy on those sectors of civil society, which have the long-term potential to bring about positive change and democ\u00adra\u00adti\u00adzation of the country.<\/p>\n

The impulse to this change can only emerge organ\u00adi\u00adcally from inside the country. There is hardly any feasible way to speed up the civic maturation or to make society demand pluralism and self-gover\u00adnance. Such changes are usually driven by tectonic internal trends of urban\u00adization, devel\u00adopment of a private sector, gener\u00ada\u00adtional change, rising levels of education or degra\u00addation of the ruling regime.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, even despite regular crack\u00addowns, some civil society organi\u00adza\u00adtions are vibrant and gaining steam in Belarus. This pool includes networks of grass\u00adroots volunteer initia\u00adtives, the crowd\u00adsourcing and crowd\u00adfunding platforms, human rights defenders\u2019 groups etc.<\/p>\n

One of the most acute examples of this is the #ByCovid19 initiative. It was born as an alliance of initia\u00adtives from several civil society sectors. They managed to crowd\u00adsource unprece\u00addented amount of funds (hundreds of thousands of Euros) and hundreds of volun\u00adteers to support the frontline healthcare workers with what they needed. While the government did little and, at times, was dismissive of the pandemic, the volun\u00adteers produced masks, face-protection plastic screens and other kinds of protective gear. They organized the delivery of food and disin\u00adfec\u00adtants to doctors all over the country.<\/p>\n

Key to their success was the profound public trust earned by their actions. Building that trust is crucial to the long-term sustain\u00adability of civil society groups, but also for the nationwide and local independent media, human rights defenders and bloggers.<\/p>\n

These manifes\u00adta\u00adtions of civil activism at first glance might seem somewhat apolitical or toothless. This is a mistaken perception. The mentioned #ByCovid19 initiative has grown out of another project #ByHelp, which, among other things, used to run crowd\u00adfunding campaigns in support of activists and politi\u00adcians, who had been fined for street protests. There is no doubt that technical expertise, skills of networking and mobilization gained during COVID-19 outbreak will be used again future, poten\u00adtially \u2013 in circum\u00adstances that are more political.<\/p>\n

These new movement mark a change of mind of the Belarusian society. 15 years ago, there was only few independent political and societal activity besides the tradi\u00adtional opposition movements and some brave human right groups. Today, broader parts of a more self-confident society take over respon\u00adsi\u00adbility for their issues no longer waiting for the author\u00adi\u00adtarian state to organize public life.<\/p>\n

Autocratic systems built around the person\u00adality of the leader can fold like the house of cards, with no one expecting it. If followed by vacuum, the new regime might appear to be even tougher than the previous one. To prepare for the inevitable time of changes in Belarus, civil society struc\u00adtures should be ready and able to coordinate citizens and take respon\u00adsi\u00adbility for the country\u2019s future. Alas, as of today, the Belarusian opposition does not qualify to be this force.<\/p>\n

Supporting the horizontal infra\u00adstructure of activism, together with independent media, bloggers and human rights defenders, would be an investment into a long-term resilience of Belarusian civil society. These agents of change, unlike the tradi\u00adtional opposition, are likely to make a difference for the democ\u00adratic opening of the society.<\/p>\n

For European partners, a learning should be that the former focusing on elections and campaigns as leverage for and indicator of democ\u00adratic change is no longer an appro\u00adpriate political strategy towards Belarus. Even though election campaigns can become a catalyst for politi\u00adzation, democracy is more than just more or less free and fair elections and must grow from the bottom. Working for opening spaces for civil engagement might be more promising on the long run.<\/p>\n

\"Textende\"[\/vc_column_text][vc_separator][vc_column_text]Hat Ihnen unser Beitrag gefallen? Dann spenden Sie doch einfach und bequem \u00fcber unser Spendentool. Sie unter\u00adst\u00fctzen damit die publizis\u00adtische Arbeit von LibMod.<\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]