{"id":47912,"date":"2022-07-18T18:06:56","date_gmt":"2022-07-18T16:06:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/libmod.de\/fuecks-spiegel-verzagtes-deutschland-copy\/"},"modified":"2022-10-06T23:13:18","modified_gmt":"2022-10-06T21:13:18","slug":"fuecks-irritations-about-germany","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/libmod.de\/en\/fuecks-irritations-about-germany\/","title":{"rendered":"Irrita\u00adtions about Germany"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Foto: Imago Images<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=\u201d.vc_custom_1508251598805{margin-top: 30px !important;}\u201d][vc_column width=\u201c2\/3\u201d css=\u201d.vc_custom_1508252250311{padding-right: 20px !important;}\u201d][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Chancellor Scholz supports Ukraine only so much that it can defend itself with diffi\u00adculty, but cannot launch a counter\u00adattack. But if Putin is not defeated in Ukraine, there will be no peace in Europe.<\/h3>\n

<\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

Russia\u2019s war against Ukraine is entering its 21st week. What was horri\u00adfying at the beginning is beginning to become habitual: the bombing of residential neigh\u00adbour\u00adhoods and the attacks against hospitals, the targeted destruction of vital infra\u00adstructure, the blockade of Ukraine\u2019s Black Sea ports, the mass execu\u00adtions and rapes in the terri\u00adtories conquered by Russia, the depor\u00adtation of more than one million Ukrainians to Russia, a refugee population in the tens of millions, the growing losses of the Ukrainian army under a hail of fire from Russian artillery, missiles and tanks.<\/p>

\"Portrait<\/p>\n

Ralf F\u00fccks<\/a> is managing director of the Center for Liberal Modernity.<\/p><\/div>\n

Other, domestic worries are super\u00adim\u00adposed on the horror news from Ukraine \u2014 inflation, skyrock\u00adeting energy prices and the threat of recession. The prospect of the Kremlin cutting its gas supplies to zero is prompting the federal government to ask Canada to suspend export sanctions against Russia and release the delivery of a turbine for the Nord Stream 1 gas pipeline. In principle, we are in favour of sanctions against Russia\u2019s war economy, but unfor\u00adtu\u00adnately we have willingly become dependent on Russian fossil fuels. Since the beginning of the war, the EU has imported nearly a hundred billion euros worth of Russian oil and gas; the shirt is closer than the skirt.<\/p>\n

In the Foreign Affairs Committee, Chancellor Scholz rejects the demand for the delivery of Marder infantry fighting vehicles for Ukraine with the remark \u201cThat would be a terrible escalation<\/em>.\u201d Defence Minister Lambrecht responds to the Union\u2019s request to give 200 of 825 armoured Fuchs trans\u00adports to Ukraine with a categorical \u201cWe will not let the Bundeswehr be plundered<\/em>.\u201d More coldness and distance towards Ukraine is hardly possible. One would like to know what acute threat scenario the minister is assuming that does not allow Ukraine to be supported from the Bundeswehr\u2019s stocks? Is an attack on the Baltic States or Poland imminent \u2014 or is it not rather the case that every tank shot down, every missile launcher destroyed, every company of the Russian army routed increases our security? If we want to keep Russia out of NATO, we must do every\u00adthing we can to make Putin fail in Ukraine.<\/p>\n

Russia\u2019s strate\u00adgists of confrontation are counting on the West\u2019s conflict aversion, short-sight\u00adedness and indif\u00adference. They are convinced that they are in the driver\u2019s seat, even though Europe and the USA are vastly superior econom\u00adi\u00adcally and also have the greater military potential. Putin considers Europe \u2014 Germany first of all \u2014 to be fearful and spoiled by prosperity. Why make sacri\u00adfices for Ukraine or even risk a war with Russia? He may be right.<\/p>\n

Appeasement will not stop Putin<\/h2>\n

The call for Ukraine to stop standing in the way of an end to the war and give Putin what he wants is gaining ground. Clausewitz put this inversion of perpe\u00adtrator and victim in the ironic formu\u00adlation that ultimately the defender is to blame for the war because he stands in the way of the aggressor: the aggressor would like to invade quite peace\u00adfully. Our subju\u00adgation pacifists are fully serious. They agree with Lavrov that the West is unnec\u00ades\u00adsarily prolonging the war with its arms deliv\u00aderies. In their view, the Ukraine has no chance of stopping the Russian advance anyway. This not only makes a mockery of the deter\u00admi\u00adnation of Ukrainians \u2014 men and women alike \u2014 to fight for their indepen\u00addence and freedom. The call for a compromise with Putin also fails to recognise the nature of the Russian campaign.<\/p>\n

Russia is waging a war of exter\u00admi\u00adnation against Ukraine as a nation. Anyone who does not joyfully welcome the Russian \u201cliber\u00adators\u201d is a \u201cfascist\u201d and at the mercy of the conqueror\u2019s violence. The cession of southern and eastern Ukraine to Russia would not bring peace, but a wave of liqui\u00adda\u00adtions, arrests and depor\u00adta\u00adtions. Butcha and Mariupol have taught Ukrainians that there can be no arrangement with Russia. And why should Putin be satisfied with another big bite out of Ukraine\u2019s territory? The annex\u00adation of Crimea and the de facto annex\u00adation of the puppet republics in the Donbas have only increased his appetite. We should finally take note that he is concerned about the whole of Ukraine \u2014 and not just Ukraine.<\/p>\n

Putin is on a revan\u00adchist trip. He wants to collect the lost provinces of the Russian Empire, regain dominance over Central-Eastern Europe and control the Black Sea. If the West does not have the strength to stop him in Ukraine, the next advance is only a matter of time. The Kremlin has made it suffi\u00adciently clear that for it an end to the war is only an option if Ukraine accepts Russian demands. Such a \u201cnegotiated peace\u201d would not only be a third-class funeral for any value-based European order. Appeasement towards an aggressor does not create sustainable peace. If Putin walks off the battle\u00adfield with even a partial victory, we will see a long period of war risk and insta\u00adbility on Europe\u2019s eastern flank. Last but not least, horse-trading with Russia will cause massive dislo\u00adcation within the EU and NATO. Already today, our allies in Central Eastern Europe are looking at Germany with growing irritation. In their eyes, Berlin\u2019s hesitant policy is a contin\u00adu\u00adation of the German Sonderweg towards Russia.<\/p>\n

The question of the motives and goals of Germany\u2019s policy does not come out of the blue. So far, the Chancellor has delib\u00ader\u00adately left the answer vague. His constantly repeated formula \u201cRussia must not win this war, Ukraine must not lose it\u201d leaves it open which outcome of the conflict he is heading for. The assertion that \u201cUkraine must endure\u201d also leaves open the question of its future borders. Olaf Scholz likes to justify this strategic ambiguity by saying that he does not want to prejudge the Ukrainian government: whether it wants to make conces\u00adsions, and if so, which ones, is its sovereign decision. That sounds good, but it ignores the fact that the outcome of this war also depends on us. Ukraine\u2019s willingness to fight is not lacking. What is lacking are \u201cheavy weapons\u201d \u2014 long-range artillery, rocket launchers, air defence systems, armoured vehicles \u2014 to break the Russian superi\u00adority. This is not a hopeless endeavour. Russia has suffered massive losses of men and material. The Kremlin\u2019s reserves are large, but not unlimited, especially since the production of supplies is faltering due to Western technology sanctions.<\/p>\n

Three scenarios<\/h2>\n

After the failure of its blitzkrieg in the first weeks of the war, the Russian leadership is now betting on a classic material battle in which the sheer superi\u00adority of weapons and ammunition should bring the decision. In this situation, there are three possible scenarios for an end to the war:<\/p>\n

(1) Ukraine gradually bleeds out and has to submit to a Russian dicta\u00adtorial peace, which means the end of its sovereignty.<\/p>\n

(2) The West supports Ukraine to such an extent that it can slow down the Russian advance at heavy losses until the war eventually comes to a halt and turns into a precarious ceasefire. Where the new demar\u00adcation line will be is open \u2014 can Kharkiv and Odessa be defended or will they be part of the Russian-occupied zone in the future?<\/p>\n

(3) Europe and the USA enable Ukraine to repel the Russian offensive and to counter\u00adattack itself in order to push the attackers back at least to the borders of 24 February, and perhaps beyond in the Donbass. For this, it is not enough to help Ukraine out with a handful of artillery systems here and there. If we want it to win this war, it needs massive, rapid and continuous arms deliv\u00aderies. The old Soviet weapon systems must be succes\u00adsively replaced by modern Western equipment, including battle tanks. This requires the early training of Ukrainian soldiers on these weapons. In the short term, deliv\u00aderies must be made from existing stocks, while at the same time arms production in Europe must be ramped up.<\/p>\n

If we look at the policy of the German government so far \u2014 more precisely: of the chancellor and his defence minister \u2014 it amounts to the second scenario: Ukraine should not lose, but not win either, Putin should not triumph, but not lose either. If one rejects the assumption that Berlin is ultimately aiming at horse-trading with Moscow, two expla\u00adna\u00adtions remain. The first is economic: Scholz doesn\u2019t want to get too close to Putin for fear that he might cut off our gas supply completely in return. The other expla\u00adnation is provided by the chancellor himself when he repeatedly stresses his concern about an escalation of the war and reiterates his firm resolve that Germany must not become a party to the war. Behind this is the fear that Putin will run amok if he is faced with a military defeat in Ukraine.<\/p>\n

Signif\u00adi\u00adcantly, this fear is partic\u00adu\u00adlarly pronounced in Germany. It does not play an action-guiding role in Poland, the Baltic and Scandi\u00adnavian states, which are on the front line with Russia. In Germany, the lesson from the lost Second World War is: never again war, certainly not with Russia. Our neigh\u00adbours have learned a different lesson from this catastrophe: Never again appeasement. They know better which Russia we are dealing with and what is at stake in Ukraine. And they are better realpoli\u00adtikers when they insist that Russia must be stopped in Ukraine to prevent even greater disaster.<\/p>\n

The West has many times greater economic reserves and military potential than the Putin regime. What is lacking is the political will to put a stop to Russian neo-imperi\u00adalism. The Bundestag has voted overwhelm\u00adingly in favour of supplying heavy weapons to Ukraine, without restric\u00adtions. The German government should follow this decision. Otherwise, we will once again have to answer the question why we did not do more to stop a war of extermination.<\/p>\n

* This the English trans\u00adlation of an essay published by SPIEGEL.de on 13 July 2022<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

\"Textende\"[\/vc_column_text][vc_separator][vc_column_text]Did you like thike this article? If yes, you can support the independent editorial work and journalism of LibMod via a simple donation tool.[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]