Ukraine’s EU Accession: Full Steam Ahead but Bottlenecks Remain
Ukraine’s membership bid taken on real momentum since the country applied for EU membership in the early days of the full-scale invasion. Though Ukraine’s track record is generally positive, the devil is in the details. Difficult reforms, especially in the judiciary, require the attention and support of the EU and its member states.
Executive summary
Ukraine’s membership bid taken on real momentum since the country applied for EU membership in the early days of the full-scale invasion. Though Ukraine’s track record is generally positive, the devil is in the details. Difficult reforms, especially in the judiciary, require the attention and support of the EU and its member states.
On 28 February 2022, just days after Russian troops attacked Ukraine from the north, east, and south, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy submitted a bold application for membership in the European Union (EU). This daring move came at a time when Russian forces were on the outskirts of Kyiv and the fate of the nation hung in the balance. Since then, Ukraine has made remarkable progress with its historic membership bid, despite the ongoing war of aggression and the numerous challenges it poses to the state, its bureaucracy, and society.
In the two years following the application, Ukraine swiftly advanced from candidate country status to the first Intergovernmental Conference in June 2024. The adoption of the Negotiating Framework in March of 2024 marked the formal start of the accession process. The analytical examination of Ukraine’s compliance with EU laws has progressed smoothly since then.
The screening process having been completed for the first of six negotiation clusters, the EU and Ukraine are expected to open cluster negotiations in the first half of 2025, under the current Polish Presidency of the European Council. This first cluster focuses on
Moderate progress in
alignment with EU acquis?
While Ukraine has been lauded for its ambitious political goal of completing the accession process in record time, its substantive efforts in this area are under scrutiny. One the whole, Ukraine’s track record since its application is good, though challenges persist. The 2023 and 2024 European Commission enlargement reports highlighted significant progress but also emphasised areas needing improvement.
The pace of change since late 2023 has been moderate. The EC’s 2024 report notes, “Ukraine has some level of preparation with regard to the judiciary, the fight against corruption, and respect for fundamental rights, and has made some progress.” An analysis by the Ukrainian news outlet European Truth found that Ukraine was the only one of the six EU accession candidates that had failed to make “substantial progress” between the two reports.
The two independent shadow reports from Ukrainian civil society also emphasise the continuing need for extensive reforms. Mykhailo Zhernakov, an expert on the judiciary and co-author of one of the shadow reports, characterised the progress in judicial reforms in 2024 as minimal, noting that no progress was made on Supreme Court reform, even in the wake of a major corruption scandal at the Court in 2023.
The judiciary remains the most significant stumbling block for Ukraine’s EU bid. Reform in this area must reach beyond ensuring judicial independence: a thorough overhaul of personnel selection processes is needed, to shift the emphasis to candidate qualifications and ensure integrity. The success of Ukraine’s Anti-Corruption Courts demonstrates the value of involving international experts to uphold high ethical standards—an approach that could be extended to other institutions, such as the National Police and the Customs Service.
Public sector reform is
critically important
One often-overlooked obstacle to Ukraine’s EU ambitions is the limited capacity of its public sector to adopt and implement EU laws. The strengthening of public administration, reform of the civil services, and improvement of evidence-based policymaking and monitoring is of critical importance.
Lessons from other EU candidate countries suggest that Ukraine’s negotiation teams should be made up of a balanced group of political appointees and bureaucratic experts in order to maintain institutional memory and ensure continuity during political transitions. Currently, the negotiation teams are led exclusively by politically appointed deputy ministers, with no bureaucrats serving as deputy heads of the negotiating groups.
Political will and public
support remain strong
Despite the slow pace of reforms in recent months, the political momentum in Kyiv, Brussels, and most European capitals remains strong. Ukrainian leaders, including the President, Prime Minister, and Deputy Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, have consistently reaffirmed their commitment to EU membership. This political resolve is bolstered by record levels of public support. The 2024 EU enlargement report notes, “There is an overall consensus among Ukrainian society and authorities, including the parliamentary opposition, that EU integration is a priority for the country.”
This public enthusiasm and political determination underscore the transformative potential of EU membership, particularly with respect to advancing difficult reforms such as judicial overhauls.
Pace of reforms expected to increase in 2025
With the screening process for the fundamentals cluster complete and negotiations set to open, reform efforts are expected to gain momentum in 2025. The European Commission will establish detailed roadmaps with benchmarks, enabling better monitoring and implementation of necessary changes.
For maximum impact, these roadmaps must include clear, specific benchmarks for each area of reform. This will ensure effective implementation and allow independent experts and the Commission to assess progress accurately.
Encouragingly, the EU’s leadership remains highly supportive of Ukraine’s bid. The European Commission President, the High Representative, the Enlargement Commissioner, and the Council President have all reiterated their commitment to Ukraine’s aspirations. Public support within the EU for Ukraine’s membership also remains robust.
Conclusions
Ukraine must work closely with the EU and its member states to seize this historic window of opportunity and achieve meaningful reform breakthroughs, particularly in the judiciary. 2025 is an important year and the EU and its member states must ensure that the political will to join as fast as possible translates into tangible and qualitative reform efforts. Technical and political support will be essential to ensure the quality, success, and sustainability of these reforms. At the same time the EU and its institutions must make sure that reform commitments are met. That is why the speed and quality of Ukraine’s EU bid depends on how specific the EU and Ukraine formulate the roadmaps and benchmarks, against which the progress can be measured.
Ultimately, while Kyiv must adopt, implement, and adhere to European laws and norms, the timing of Ukraine’s accession will also depend on the resolution of its war with Russia, the pace of post-war reconstruction, and the EU’s readiness to absorb new members. While the path ahead is fraught with uncertainty, Ukraine’s commitment to reforms, even during this existential conflict, remains its best chance to achieve its European aspirations.
Hat Ihnen unser Beitrag gefallen? Dann spenden Sie doch einfach und bequem über unser Spendentool. Sie unterstützen damit die publizistische Arbeit von LibMod.
Spenden mit Bankeinzug
Spenden mit PayPal
Wir sind als gemeinnützig anerkannt, entsprechend sind Spenden steuerlich absetzbar. Für eine Spendenbescheinigung (nötig bei einem Betrag über 200 EUR), senden Sie Ihre Adressdaten bitte an finanzen@libmod.de
Verwandte Themen
Newsletter bestellen
Mit dem LibMod-Newsletter erhalten Sie regelmäßig Neuigkeiten zu unseren Themen in Ihr Postfach.
![](https://libmodredaktion.fra1.digitaloceanspaces.com/wp-content/uploads/20250205110915/800_EU_Parla_.jpg)