EU-Ukraine Summit 2021: What does it say about the state of EU-Ukraine relations after 7 years of the association?

Foto: European Union

The consid­erable break­throughs in the EU-Ukraine economic agenda have been harmed by sluggish political devel­opment, partic­u­larly concerning the rule of law. The judicial reform, anti-corruption efforts, independent and efficient law-enforcement insti­tu­tions and legally sound ‘de-oligarchi­sation’ remain the top prior­ities, where Ukraine still has to do the homework and the EU enhance its monitoring and verifi­cation efforts. Without progress in these critical areas economic integration risks to be stalled. 

The 23rd EU-Ukraine Summit, held in Kyiv on October 12, 2021, marked the seventh anniversary of the Associ­ation Agreement (AA), the major game-changer in the relations between the parties. The Joint Statement following the Summit is a good signboard for under­standing the status of the relations and the plans for the future.

The EU has been the primary trade partner of Ukraine, and its role further strengthens in 2021. According to the customs data, in the first nine months of 2021, Ukraine’s exports of goods to the EU reached USD 20 bn, so that annual figures will surpass the previous peak regis­tered in 2019 (USD 21 bn). Likewise, imports of goods from the EU have also resumed its growth, although slower. As a result, the EU accounts for 42% of Ukraine’s goods exports and 43% of imports.

In the policy domain, the impor­tance of trade with the EU trans­lates into reducing tariffs and non-tariff barriers (NTBs) to trade as envisaged in the deep and compre­hensive free trade area (DCFTA), the integral part of the AA.

Although the DCFTA envisages signif­icant tariffs liber­al­ization, both partners preserved non-zero duties for selected, mostly agro-food, products. For this purpose, the EU estab­lished tariff-rate quotas for 36 categories, while Ukraine used three tariff rate quotas and preserved some non-zero duties.  However, the Agreement allows tariff liber­al­ization accel­er­ation after five years since the launch. Ukraine has initiated consul­ta­tions regarding this liber­al­ization already in early 2021. The current Summit Joint Decla­ration marks the next important step, welcoming the launch of “negoti­a­tions on broad­ening and accel­er­ating the scope of the elimi­nation of customs duties”. It is a signif­icant break­through, hoping to resolve Ukraine’s most critical business concern regarding the AA/​DCFTA.

Another essential element of the economic integration of Ukraine into the EU internal market is the elimi­nation of non-tariff barriers to trade. To achieve that, the DCFTA envisages the conclusion of the Agreement on Conformity Assessment and Accep­tance of indus­trial products (ACAA) for indus­trial goods, the recog­nition of equiv­a­lence for food and related products, and trade facil­i­tation measured through the mutual recog­nition of autho­rized economic opera­tions (AEO) and the integration of Ukraine into the European common transit system.

Recently, the public focus has been on the conclusion of the framework ACAA incor­po­rating three specific areas, namely machinery, low voltage equipment and electro­mag­netic compat­i­bility. In mid-2021, the EU expert mission concluded a pre-assessment of Ukraine’s legis­lation related to the ACAA, confirming a relatively high, although still incom­plete, degree of legal alignment. In September, the second phase of evalu­ating quality infra­structure began. If Ukraine imple­ments the mission’s recom­men­da­tions swiftly, we could expect the launch of the ACAA talks already in 2022.

The Joint Decla­ration does not mention two other essential NTBs, namely food safety and customs proce­dures, where substantial progress has also been achieved. In particular, Ukraine has already aligned its legis­lation and launched a parallel use of the NCTS, preparing to join the European common transit system, expected by 2023. In addition, the first Ukrainian company got the AEO status, paving the way for the mutual recog­nition of the AEO between Ukraine and the EU. As for the food safety sphere, the first recog­nition of equiv­a­lence for certi­fi­cation systems – for cereal seeds – was achieved in late 2020.

The Joint Decla­ration also marked the vital break­through in the AA/​DCFTA modern­ization in the trade of services. The parties reported on the update of Annex XVII of the AA for telecom­mu­ni­cation, postal and courier and inter­na­tional maritime transport services. Moreover, the Summit reiterated AA commit­ments regarding the internal market treatment for telecom­mu­ni­cation services confirming Ukraine’s efforts to achieve it and the EU readiness to provide it. Other forth­coming integration elements could be the mutual recog­nition of electronic trust services, signif­i­cantly simpli­fying business opera­tions between Ukraine and the EU. The Decla­ration also mentions Ukraine’s efforts to align with the EU Digital Single Market, but without the explicit commit­ments regarding Ukraine’s accession.

In transport, the key achievement of the Summit is the conclusion of the Common Aviation Area (CAA) Agreement, the well overdue event as the document was initialled back in 2013. The market opening will happen in several stages, linked to the speed of Ukraine’s approx­i­mation efforts. The progress in inland waterways and railway transport are also mentioned. However, the Decla­ration omits road transport, where the deficit of transit permits has already created tangible barriers for trade in goods – for both Ukraine and its EU counter­parts. The resolution of this bottleneck should remain in the focus of the EU-Ukraine relations.

Given the vital impor­tance of energy security for both the EU and Ukraine, the parties have always focused on energy issues. Over the last seven years, Ukraine has trans­formed its gas and electricity markets in line with the EU norms. That has allowed the country to deepen inter­con­nection with the European gas market through agree­ments on the cooper­ation of operators of gas trans­mission networks of Ukraine and neigh­bouring EU member states. It has also paved the way for the forth­coming synchro­nization with the ENTSO‑E power grid, the prepa­ra­tions for which are ongoing. The Summit confirmed the mutual interest in further integration based on the EU norms and the impor­tance of Ukraine’s gas transit system for the European energy security and agreed to “consult and co-ordinate, as appro­priate, on [energy] infra­structure devel­op­ments”.

As a sign of the future, the Joint Decla­ration has also covered the Green Deal, partic­u­larly welcoming the launch of the EU-Ukraine dialogue on the European Green Deal and Ukraine’s Green Transition. However, although the EU promised to support Ukraine in devel­oping its carbon pricing policy in the context of the Carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), no exemp­tions for Ukraine have been mentioned. Accord­ingly, certain Ukrainian export products will be imposed with additional certifi­cates to adjust to the carbon price level of the EU Emission trading system.

The consid­erable break­throughs in the EU-Ukraine economic agenda have been harmed by sluggish political devel­opment, partic­u­larly concerning the rule of law. The judicial reform, anti-corruption efforts, independent and efficient law-enforcement insti­tu­tions and legally sound ‘de-oligarchi­sation’ remain the top priority for the relations, as highlighted in the Joint Decla­ration. Regret­fully, in this sphere, Ukraine is still lagging with multiple challenges to resolve. Before the Summit, experts called for identi­fying the G7’s roadmap for judicial and anti-corruption reforms in Ukraine as a tool for imple­menting the political associ­ation and initi­ating talks on joint border control. Unfor­tu­nately, though, the Joint Decla­ration does not contain these provisions.

Summing up, Ukraine and the EU signif­i­cantly deepened their economic and especially trade integration against the background of Ukraine’s gradually progressing legal and insti­tu­tional approx­i­mation over the last seven years. However, for further progress, it is essential to have the EU-Ukraine join work on monitoring and verifi­cation that these efforts are compliant with the EU norms and practices as it is the prereq­uisite for integration to the EU Internal Market. Therefore, it is very encour­aging that the Joint Decla­ration confirms this mutual commitment.

However, some of Ukraine’s state funda­mentals, partic­u­larly the rule of law, remain fragile, hampering the economic progress and European integration perspec­tives. It is the locus of the battle for the European future of Ukraine now.


Veronika Movchan is an Academic Director at the Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting — IER (Kyiv). Her main research interests lie in the sphere of trade policy, including WTO-related issues, regional integration, non-tariff measures, quantifi­cation of trade policy instru­ments, and modeling of policy changes, including the CGE modelling. She worked as research fellow at Stanford University (USA) and the DIW-Berlin, Germany, as well as a consultant at the World Bank Resident Mission in Kyiv and the Harvard Institute for Inter­na­tional Devel­opment (Ukraine).

 

 

Textende

Did you like thike this article? If yes, you can support the independent editorial work and journalism of LibMod via a simple donation tool.

We are recog­nized as a non-profit organi­zation, accord­ingly donations are tax deductible. For a donation receipt (necessary for an amount over 200 EUR), please send your address data to finanzen@libmod.de

Related topics

Newsletter bestellen

Stay tuned with our regular newsletter about all our relevant subjects.

Mit unseren Daten­schutzbes­tim­mungen
erklären Sie sich einverstanden.