Study on Russia: The other perspective on climate change (summary)

Climate Change and Green Modernity still are difficult topics in Russia

Climate change and its conse­quences are viewed differ­ently in Russia than is the case in the West. The issue is under­stood as “part of a political game”. This difference in outlook has ramifi­ca­tions for both political and economic cooper­ation. The interview study “Russian Experts’ Opinions on Global Climate Change”, conducted by Russia’s Levada-Center and commis­sioned by the Center for Liberal Modernity, affords in-depth insight into the Russian elites’ perspective on climate change and its societal and economic conse­quences.

Russia’s relationship to climate change and climate protection is an ambivalent one. The country already started exper­i­menting with wind energy back in the 1970s, its climate experts began warning about the dangers of climate change early on, and the Russian government signed on to the Paris Agreement, albeit somewhat belatedly.

On the other hand, the fossil fuel sector makes up a good 20 percent of Russia’s GDP while modern renewable energies account for less than one percent. Moreover, the Kremlin insisted for years that human activity did not influence the climate.

The study conducted by the highly respected Levada-Institute and commis­sioned by the Center for Liberal Modernity, a Berlin-based think tank, uncovers the reasons for the difference in the perception of climate change. The inter­views with Russian experts from the spheres of research, business, politics and the media afford in-depth insight into the attitudes of the Russian elites towards climate change and its consequences.

Climate change did not even make it onto the public’s radar in Russia until a few years ago; there is no willingness to take individual or collective action on the issue. According to recent Levade-Center surveys, climate change ranks low on the Russian public’s list of immediate ecological problems, although 75 percent of the population believes that human activity plays a role in global warming.

The voices repro­duced in the study make it quite clear that the framing of the discussion on climate change and efforts to combat in Russian society and among Russian elites is different from that in the West.

Under­standing this different way of seeing the issue is important to under­standing where attitude of Russian elites to Western climate protection initia­tives, such as the European Green Deal, comes from and what lies behind their engagement on behalf of Nord Stream 2, the natural gas pipeline.

Threat to Russian identity 

In Russia, global warming – along with the noticeable loss of “real” winter associated with it – is perceived as a threat to Russian identity.  Yet the discussion about causes and responses is seen as the sinister workings of anti-Russian forces. The prevailing feeling among parts of the population, including some of the elites, is that there is an attempt to blame Russia for the pollution of the atmos­phere by green­house gases and the worsening climate around the world.

Moreover, the discussion about climate change is perceived as a Western discourse. The state­ments cited in the study make it clear that the conflict between Russian and the West forms the backdrop against which Russian elites see the climate protection measures and their consequences.

Russia plans are different: its “Energy strategy 2035” antic­i­pates an increase in exports of oil, natural gas and coal in the coming years. Thus, the European plans for a drastic reduction in the consumption of fossil fuels appear as an attack on Russian interests.

Several of the experts inter­viewed flatly dismissed the notion of a “green” economy, seeing it as a pipedream doomed to failure. Initial forays in that direction by the EU and more recently by the USA are assessed as attempts to squeeze Russia out of the inter­na­tional oil market to the advantage of the USA.

Inability to envision a post-fossil future 

The hesitation or outright rejection with which some members of the Russian elites feel towards key measures towards an ecological moderni­sation of the Russian economy is associated with a fear that economic decline would result.

Partic­u­larly in the regions that are highly dependent on oil, natural gas or coal, people are unable to imagine the possi­bility of another kind of economic activity. Yet some experts are aware of the dynamics of the changes happening around Russia:  “‘[G]reen’ politics [are] right at the start of their devel­opment. If it continues at this pace, many countries will simply no longer have a need for oil.” Some expressed concern about falling out of touch with devel­op­ments and suffering substantial economic damage as a result.

Benefits that an ecological moderni­sation of the economy might bring and stimuli for growth and diver­si­fi­cation that might result were seen in isolated cases. However, the Levada-Center study makes it clear that liberal forces harbour almost no hope for changes under the current government. Depen­dence on the fossil fuel sector is too great.

Similarly, neither the opposition nor Russia’s current leadership has envisioned what an alter­native Russia might look like. The opposition has almost nothing in the way of positive images of the future to offer. The images that do exist involve crises and war or a contin­u­ation along current lines.

Textende

Did you like thike this article? If yes, you can support the independent editorial work and journalism of LibMod via a simple donation tool.

We are recog­nized as a non-profit organi­zation, accord­ingly donations are tax deductible. For a donation receipt (necessary for an amount over 200 EUR), please send your address data to finanzen@libmod.de

Related topics

Newsletter bestellen

Stay tuned with our regular newsletter about all our relevant subjects.

Mit unseren Daten­schutzbes­tim­mungen
erklären Sie sich einverstanden.